<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unemployment tax comes at bad time, say businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2009/10/05/unemployment-tax-comes-at-bad-time-say-businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2009/10/05/unemployment-tax-comes-at-bad-time-say-businesses/</link>
	<description>Richmond&#039;s Homepage For Business News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2009/10/05/unemployment-tax-comes-at-bad-time-say-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-10204</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondbizsense.com/?p=12035#comment-10204</guid>
		<description>I fail to see how the annual tax of $263 per year is going to dissuade businesses from filling a position if they actually need the added workforce. 

For example, a full-time year-round salaried employee will be paid for 2080 hours per year. A $263 unemployment tax translates to approximately $0.13 per hour. For a worker with a hourly wage of $20, absorbing the full cost of the unemployment tax would represent approximately one-half of one-percent of their hourly take-home pay. Even for a minimum wage employee this would represent less than 2% of that employee&#039;s hourly salary.

Any firm that claims the unemployment tax prevents them from hiring additional employees probably isn&#039;t in the financial condition to hire new employees to begin with. This is a naked anti-tax push, using the specter of increased unemployment to mask the simple fact that businesses just don&#039;t want to pay their fair share for the unemployment system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how the annual tax of $263 per year is going to dissuade businesses from filling a position if they actually need the added workforce. </p>
<p>For example, a full-time year-round salaried employee will be paid for 2080 hours per year. A $263 unemployment tax translates to approximately $0.13 per hour. For a worker with a hourly wage of $20, absorbing the full cost of the unemployment tax would represent approximately one-half of one-percent of their hourly take-home pay. Even for a minimum wage employee this would represent less than 2% of that employee&#8217;s hourly salary.</p>
<p>Any firm that claims the unemployment tax prevents them from hiring additional employees probably isn&#8217;t in the financial condition to hire new employees to begin with. This is a naked anti-tax push, using the specter of increased unemployment to mask the simple fact that businesses just don&#8217;t want to pay their fair share for the unemployment system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

