Shopping-bag tax proposed

February 8, 2010 by Frances Correa 

Grocery shopping would be pricier — but Virginia’s environment would be cleaner — under a proposed state tax on disposable plastic and paper bags provided by retailers.

House Bill 1115, sponsored by Del. Adam Ebbin, D-Arlington, would require retailers to charge shoppers 5 cents for each non-reusable bag issued to customers. The money would go into the Virginia Water Quality Improvement Fund. Shoppers could avoid the tax by bringing their own bags.

Ebbin and Del. Joseph Morrissey, D-Highland Springs, held a news conference Thursday to muster support for the bill, which is called the Virginia Waterways Clean Up and Consumer Choice Act.

“You can’t deny that if you don’t use plastic bags, that it’s not good for the environment,” Ebbin said.

He said the average Virginian uses about 300 non-reusable bags per year – a total of more than 2 billion bags annually. Only 1 to 2 percent of those bags are recycled, Ebbin said.

His bill would let retailers keep 1 cent of the 5-cent fee or 2 cents if the store has a customer bag credit program.

The tax would not apply to durable plastic bags, with handles that are specifically designed for multiple uses or bags used for meat, fish, poultry, ice cream, leftover restaurant food, newspapers, dry cleaning and prescription drugs.

Ebbin said that in the first year, the fee would raise about $48 million for the Water Quality Improvement Fund.

Under the bill, a retailer who fails to collect the fee could be fined up to $1,000. A subcommittee of the House Finance Committee is scheduled to consider HB 1115 on Tuesday.

A different panel has killed a related bill, House Bill 521, sponsored by Morrissey. His measure would have imposed an outright ban on the use of plastic carryout bags by retailers unless the bags were designed for reuse.

A subcommittee of the House Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources voted Wednesday to table Morrissey’s bill.

Limiting or banning plastic bags would be an important step toward environmental responsibility, Morrissey said.

Some U.S. cities, from Connecticut to Hawaii, have put a tax on flimsy plastic bags issued at the checkout line. On Jan. 1, Washington, started levying a 5-cent tax on each bag. San Francisco has banned plastic bags entirely.

Morrissey said China saved 37 million barrels of oil by banning plastic bags in 2008.

“I’m slightly disappointed that Virginia is not leading the way,” Morrissey said.

Frances Correa contributed this story through the VCU School of Journalism’s Capital News Service.





Comments

9 Responses to “Shopping-bag tax proposed”

  1. Dave on February 8th, 2010 8:56 am

    What a bunch of crap! Here we go with politicians looking for more ways to get additional funds into their hands to spend. How about you guys spend more time looking at ways to cut spending, not raise our taxes. If the plastic bags are such a problem, work on having them banned! It’s time to realize that adding a tax or fee isn’t the answer to every problem that comes along.

  2. gordon g sharp bolster on February 8th, 2010 9:15 am

    mr. morrissey is seeing the very same ignorance and apathy that i saw in ireland back in 2005. i went over just as soon as they came out to do a bag tax with a solution to their plastic bag problem. my solution was based on an epa study done in ireland. plastic bags were such a problem over there that they were considered the national flower.
    having a background in advertising, i came up with a solution with all natural bags and advertisers, i had many contacts and i had all of the bag manufacturing relationships in place in pakistan, china, india and even in canada.
    none were interested, not least of which the irish epa who chose not to return calls while i was in the country- again, which i based my entire study on.
    so the fact that he has not encountered much interest speaks of a number of issues. like i did not do in ireland, he has not given the right brown envelope to the right person perhaps. apparently, that worked so well over there they are on the verge of going bankrupt and they are a financial cancer to the eu because of their ignorance, greed and arrogant sense of entitlement. sound familiar?

  3. Megan on February 8th, 2010 9:35 am

    A charge on plastic bags is a great idea. They were doing it in Italy when I was a student there, and it seemed to work great. Not sure if the money just went back to the store, or if it went back to the gov’t, but it seems like a good step here in the direction of banning them altogether. Beyond that, it’s a little more motivation for the rest of us who have the reusable bags but always forget them at home or in the car.

  4. DG on February 8th, 2010 10:29 am

    I find a tax on plastic and paper unfair.Paper has a far lower environmental impact and is often recycled as much of the state has recycling pick up programs.I have long thought paper bags should be encouraged as an alternative to plastic.Yes paper bags have an impact but not like plastic.Perhaps a lower tax on paper would be fair but an equal one is not.

  5. eric engler on February 8th, 2010 1:24 pm

    Take a ride in the time machine:
    Plastic market bags weren’t very popular until the mid-1980’s because they were difficult to load at the check out line. The familiar rack had to be invented to stock and hold them open. In the late 80’s a USA bag manufacturer had an initial public stock offering and the share price more than doubled almost immediately. The product and the company were a huge success. Now we may bury ourselves in plastic bags and packaging unless we enact laws to curtail their use.

    Now it’s fashionable to ban the plastic bags, regardless of the ‘ Googlable’ facts:
    Paper bags use more energy to produce and are more polluting to produce than plastic film.
    Isn’t it odd that ‘environmentalists’ wail about proliferation of plastic usage but not about the destruction of oxygen producing trees? Where are the noble Tree Huggers ?

    “Paper or Plastic” is the wrong question. Taxation is an easy regressive choice, not a solution.
    Both paper and plastic bags are a waste of energy and a problem to recycle. Eliminate both.
    The only opposition to banning both types of market bag will be manufacturers & stockholders.

    Here’s the solution without requiring retailers to do the legislators hidden tax dirty work:
    If you’re shopping, bring a reusable bag. If you have a lot of shopping to do, bring many bags!

  6. laura on February 8th, 2010 2:18 pm

    please, somebody! i fully support morrissey in his efforts to tax all plastic nonreusable bags. i live in a diverse, transitional neighborhood in richmond and can go outside, walk two blocks and pick up at least one dozen of these plastic bags. we must stop! it’s always best to reduce, reuse, recycle!
    laura

  7. John on February 8th, 2010 3:55 pm

    I think it would help remind me to use my reusable bags. If you want our children and their children to have a future; we need more policy like this. This is a good use of the govt.

  8. Susan on February 8th, 2010 6:25 pm

    This is typical of the kind of “government” we have come to expect from leftist Democrats. They believe that a powerful few have the right to force American citizens to give up yet another portion of their paychecks, in the form of taxation, so that government bureaucracy can be further expanded. Grocery stores will have to raise prices in order to pay accounting staff to rewrite store software, and take on additional bookkeeping and reporting duties to comply with yet another leftist demand for honestly-earned revenue. Taxation of the citizens of Virginia, who have earned their paychecks from honest labor, will not lead to a “cleaner environment.” It will, however, fatten the budget of big government. Responsible, law-abiding, decent citizens are not the ones littering our fields and highways. Responsible, taxpayers are the ones who are already recycling. However, they are always the easiest prey for those who would steal bread off their tables.

  9. Shari Jackson on February 12th, 2010 5:12 pm

    The bill (HB1115) was tabled on Tuesday, so Virginia’s representatives are the latest to reject unnecessary taxes on plastic carryout bags. California legislators recently rejected a twenty-five cent tax on plastic bags. Seattle voters threw out a bag tax proposal last year (most people there already were reusing and recycling plastic bags).

    Only Washington, D.C. has a (new) bag tax, which reportedly is being met with strong indignation by many District residents. I suspect many of them didn’t appreciate being slapped with a bag tax at checkout while hurrying to buy a week’s worth of supplies for their families as a result of the snowiest week on record.

    Most public officials have determined that a new tax is not the most effective approach to combat litter. What does work? Recycling.

    New bag recycling efforts, building on existing programs, are underway in Virginia, so shoppers can return plastic bags that aren’t being reused to most large grocery stores and other drop-off sites for recycling – along with dry-cleaning bags, newspaper bags and plastic wraps from bread, paper towels, cases of soda and more. This material is in demand to make things like durable backyard decking, home-building products, city park benches and new plastic bags.

    Instead of raising taxes, we’d like to see public officials (with support of the media) help get the word out on recycling so shoppers bring plastic bags and product wraps back to stores.

    Shari Jackson
    Director, Progressive Bag Affiliates
    Arlington, VA

Please use your real name to foster a more civil discussion.

We encourage active participation in our online community, but we reserve the right to remove any off topic or inappropriate comments.