Chesterfield
Powell Aquatics v. Greater Richmond Aquatics Partnership
In a contract dated June 30, 2011, plaintiff says it agreed to provide services and goods to defendant with the construction of aquatic amenities to property that defendant leased in Chesterfield. Plaintiff says defendant improperly terminated the contract by letter dated April 13, 2012, and alleges it has been damaged as a result of wrongful termination, delays in the work, changed work scope and accelerated schedule. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of not less than $100,000.
Law firm: John S. Wilson of Wilson & McIntyre
Filed: 9/11/2012. CL12002734
Comments are closed.