Richmond
Vasiliky A. Roumel v. Colonial Village Shopping Center LC; Kathryn V.A. Roumel; Constantine A. Roumel; Wilma Wolfe Roumel; and Kathryn V.A. Roumel, trustee of the Wilma W. Roumel revocable trust
The Roumels are members of Colonial Village Shopping Center in Arlington, founded March 5, 1997, by Wilma Roumel, who had 51% of the company, with each of the others holding 16.33%. Under the operating agreement, funds available for distribution shall be allocated and distributed in respect to their respective interest at such time as the manager shall determine, and approval of members is necessary to take various actions. Plaintiff says that over time, the company has made distributions, undocumented loans and unreimbursed advances to various members of the company, disproportionately in favor of defendants Wilma, Kathryn and Constantine. As a result, plaintiff says, as of Sept. 12, 2012, ownership balances of members are Wilma, 6.18%; plaintiff, 52.91%; Constantine, 37.13%, and Kathryn 3.78%, although defendants say that plaintiff, Constantine and Kathryn each have 30% of company, and Wilma, 10%. Plaintiff seeks declaratory judgment that members’ respective interests are as plaintiff states above; that proposed amendments to the company are not effective or enforceable; and that Kathryn Roumel be expelled from the company, among other relief.
Law firm: Robert A. Angle, Michael E. Lacy and Nicholas R. Klaiber of Troutman Sanders
Filed: 9/28/2012. CL12004239[private]
James Rouse v. Catbridge Machinery LLC
Plaintiff says he was operating a “Slitter” on Oct. 13, 2010, when tape got stuck on the “razor knife assembly.” Plaintiff says he pulled the handle to stop the Slitter and opened the safety door to get the tape unstuck. The mechanisms are designed to shut down when the safety door is opened, plaintiff says, but the knife fired and severed the plaintiff’s left index finger. It was determined the day after the accident, plaintiff says, that the safety door malfunctioned. Plaintiff alleges negligence and breach of duties by defendant, and seeks judgment in principal sum of $60,000.
Law firm: Keith B. Marcus, ParisBlank
Filed: 9/28/2012. CL12004243
Kathy Gentry v. Robins Family Limited Partnership
Plaintiff says that on or about Dec. 15, 2010, she slipped and fell on ice on the sidewalk and/or parking lot at Tuckahoe Shopping Center. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $100,000.
Law firm: Hunt H. Whitehead and Michele L. Chiocca of Whitehead & Chiocca
Filed: 10/1/2012. CL12004254
Alexander Andrewski v. Certified Services Co.; and Selma R. Mann
Plaintiff operated a business in Richmond in the 2900 block of West Clay Street known as All Service Auto Repair, in property owned by defendant Mann. Defendant Certified, a cleaning company, is located at 2916 W. Marshall St., adjacent to plaintiff’s property. During 2012, plaintiff says, defendant Certified began placing barrels containing cleaning products, garbage and other waste against the back door of plaintiff’s shop building. Plaintiff says that because of fire hazard he repeatedly moved the barrels away from his shop, but that defendant Certified continued to place barrels against the property and defendant Mann did nothing to stop it. On Sunday, April 15, 2012, defendant says he noticed smoke toward the rear of the building and contacted the fire department. Plaintiff’s business was a complete loss, and many cars under repair were damaged. Plaintiff also says he lost all equipment and materials. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $1.3 million.
Law firm: Travis R. Williams of Daniels & Morgan
Filed: 10/1/2012. CL12004255
Carter Machinery Group LLC v. Martin Construction Group LLC; “JHM” LLC; and James H. Martin Jr.
Plaintiff seeks to recover debts owed by defendants as the mere continuation of their predecessor company, J.H. Martin & Sons, and also seeks damages resulting from defendants’ alleged conspiracy to injure plaintiff in its business by fraudulently depriving it of any meaningful ability to enforce its credit financing agreement with J.H. Martin & Sons. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $397,680.85.
Law firm: W. Ryan Snow and David C. Hartnett of Crenshaw, Ware & Martin
Filed: 10/1/2012. CL12004259
Xenith Bank v. Third Avenue Properties LLC; Third Avenue Market Inc.; Mohammad Ashraf, individually; and Mohammad Ashraf, as trustee in the liquidation for Third Avenue Properties LLC
Plaintiff says defendant’s loan for the business in Farmville is in default, and seeks judgment in principal sum of not less than $222,119.20, among other relief.
Law firm: E. Duffy Myrtetus and Matthew B. Chmiel of Kaufman & Canoles
Filed: 10/2/2012. CL12004268
Yellowbook Inc. vs. Fencing Unlimited Inc.; and Roberta J. Nelson
Plaintiff says defendant entered into a contract on or about Aug. 6, 2009, to advertise in several Yellow Book Directories. Plaintiff says defendant is indebted to it, and seeks judgment in principal sum of $30,725.91.
Law firm: Stephen A. Angelidis of Steingold & Angelidis
Filed: 10/3/2012. CL12004278
Xenith Bank v. Sandy Bottom Materials Inc.; and Jennifer L. Trump
Plaintiff says defendant is in default on notes and seeks judgment in principal sum of not less than $138,388.21, among other relief, including repossession of collateral.
Law firm: E. Duffy Myretetus & Matthew B. Chmiel of Kaufman & Canoles
Filed: 10/3/2012. CL12004279
Diana Prosyk v. Kroger Limited Partnership I; Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services LLC; The Kroger Co.; and Kroger Group Inc.
Plaintiff says that on Nov. 24, 2010, on property in Salem, that because of negligence she fell and suffered severe injuries. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $750,000.
Law firm: Irving M. Blank of ParisBlank
Filed: 10/4/2012. CL12004285
Dorian Ward v. J.C. Penney Co. Inc.; and Dale Roberts
On or about Dec. 29, 2011, plaintiff says he was shopping with his girlfriend, Eleanor Scharmer, at the store in Regency Square. Scharmer intended to exchange four pairs of pants she had received from her grandmother for Christmas. Through a series of events that included an eventual return of the pants and issuance of a gift card, on which Scharmer purchased some items, they left the store. Plaintiff says they were accosted and detained by defendant Roberts, a security guard, who accused them of stealing items and returning them for credit. Plaintiff says they were interrogated in a small room, with no access to the restroom or refreshments, and that they pleaded with Roberts to review the video footage, and volunteered to have the grandmother fax copies of the receipt for the purchase of the original items, but Roberts refused. After a lengthy period of time, plaintiff says, police were contacted. Plaintiff and Scharmer were issued a summons for petit larceny and instructed to appear in court on Jan. 5, 2012, and the items were taken from them. Upon leaving the store, plaintiff and Scharmer say they tried to find a lawyer, but this was difficult as it was the New Year’s holiday that weekend. Several days later, plaintiff says, Scharmer received a voice message from a J.C. Penney representative apologizing for the mistaken detainment and that said all charges would be dismissed. The representative instructed plaintiff and Scharmer to return to the store to pick up their items and a letter of apology. Plaintiff says they went to court to ensure that their charges would be dismissed, and were informed that defendant Roberts had been fired. Plaintiff says he and Scharmer were made to wait 30 minutes or more at the store for their items and the apology letter. Plaintiff alleges false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligent hiring and negligent training. Plaintiff seeks $500,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages.
Law firm: Tracy Ann Houck and Medford J. Brown IV of Parrish, Houck & Snead
Filed: 10/5/2012. CL12004295
Eleanor Scharmer v. J.C. Penney Co. Inc.; and Dale Roberts
On or about Dec. 29, 2011, plaintiff says she was shopping with her boyfriend, Dorian Ward, at the store in Regency Square. Plaintiff intended to exchange four pairs of pants she had received from her grandmother for Christmas. Through a series of events that included an eventual return of the pants and issuance of a gift card, on which she purchased some items, they left the store. Plaintiff says they were accosted and detained by defendant Roberts, a security guard, who accused them of stealing items and returning them for credit. Plaintiff says they were interrogated in a small room, with no access to the restroom or refreshments, and that they pleaded with Roberts to review the video footage, and volunteered to have her grandmother fax copies of the receipt for the purchase of the original items, but Roberts refused. After a lengthy period of time, plaintiff says, police were contacted. Plaintiff and Ward were issued a summons for petit larceny and instructed to appear in court on Jan. 5, 2012, and the items were taken from them. Upon leaving the store, plaintiff and Ward say they tried to find a lawyer, but this was difficult as it was the New Year’s holiday that weekend. Several days later, plaintiff says, she received a voice message from a J.C. Penney representative apologizing for the mistaken detainment and that said all charges would be dismissed. The representative instructed plaintiff and Ward to return to the store to pick up their items and a letter of apology. Plaintiff says they went to court to ensure that their charges would be dismissed, and were informed that defendant Roberts had been fired. Plaintiff says she and Ward were made to wait 30 minutes or more at the store for their items and the apology letter. Plaintiff alleges false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligent hiring and negligent training. Plaintiff seeks $500,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages.
Law firm: Tracy Ann Houck and Medford J. Brown IV of Parrish, Houck & Snead
Filed: 10/5/2012. CL12004296
Cynthia E. Taylor v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP and John Doe
Plaintiff says the pharmacy in the store at 7901 Brook Road, on or about Nov. 30, 2010, misfilled a prescription for plaintiff for what was supposed to be a refill of Amoxicillin. Plaintiff instead, she says, was given capsules of Neurontin or its chemical equivalent, a powerful medication to which plaintiff had had an adverse reaction in the past. Plaintiff says she took the medication as prescribed and suffered significant injuries, and that she will continue to incur medical expenses. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $500,000.
Law firm: Thomas D. Stokes of Brenner, Evans & Millman
Filed: 10/5/2012. CL12004297
Henrico
Monica L. Ball v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., a Japanese corporation
Plaintiff says she was prescribed Dexilant 60 mg to take daily for a period of 30 days in preparation for endoscopy on Sept. 24, 2010, and also stemming from such symptoms as excessive gas, abdominal pain and dysphagia/odynophagia pain which radiated from her stomach through her esophagus. Plaintiff, then age 33, says she ingested the drug daily from Sept. 8, 2010, through Sept. 28, 2010, with the exception of the days she prepared for and underwent a colonoscopy and suffered complication on Sept. 28 and on Sept. 30. On Sept. 28, plaintiff says she went to St. Mary’s Hospital with a fever and other symptoms. On Sept. 30, she was admitted to St. Mary’s with a 104.4-degree fever, rapidly progressing exfoliative lesions over 70 percent of her body, and desquamating throat lesions from her oropharynx to her lips, as well as conjunctival effusion from her eyes. She was later diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and by a physician at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore. Plaintiff says the syndrome and resulting injuries were a proximate cause of plaintiff’s ingestion of defendants’ product Dexilant. Plaintiff says she died three times and was revived, has suffered severe pain and permanent injuries, and continued months of care and treatment at St. Mary’s, Johns Hopkins and other clinics, and will require continuing treatment. Plaintiff says had she known of the risks and dangers associated with the product, she would not have taken it. Plaintiff alleges that defendants have reaped huge profits while concealing from the public knowledge of the potential hazard associated with Dexilant. Plaintiff contends defendants had notice and knowledge prior to the date of the marketing and sale to plaintiff that the product presented a substantial and unreasonable risk of hazard to consumers. Plaintiff alleges failure to warn, defect in design or manufacture, fraud, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, negligence, gross negligence and unjust enrichment, and seeks judgment including punitive damages of $17.5 million.
Law firm: Jerrod M. Smith of Jerrod Myron Smith & Associates
Filed: 10/3/2012. CL12002755
Chesterfield
Creedle, Jones, and Alga PC v. Old River Cabinets Inc.
Plaintiff and defendant agreed on Jan. 15, 2009, that plaintiff would provide accounting services for defendant. Plaintiff alleges breach of contract and says it is owed an amount of not less than $61,936.79, and seeks judgment in that amount.
Law firm: Courtney Moates Paulk and Nathaniel L. Story of Hirschler Fleischer
Filed: 10/4/2012. CL12002992[/private]
Richmond
Vasiliky A. Roumel v. Colonial Village Shopping Center LC; Kathryn V.A. Roumel; Constantine A. Roumel; Wilma Wolfe Roumel; and Kathryn V.A. Roumel, trustee of the Wilma W. Roumel revocable trust
The Roumels are members of Colonial Village Shopping Center in Arlington, founded March 5, 1997, by Wilma Roumel, who had 51% of the company, with each of the others holding 16.33%. Under the operating agreement, funds available for distribution shall be allocated and distributed in respect to their respective interest at such time as the manager shall determine, and approval of members is necessary to take various actions. Plaintiff says that over time, the company has made distributions, undocumented loans and unreimbursed advances to various members of the company, disproportionately in favor of defendants Wilma, Kathryn and Constantine. As a result, plaintiff says, as of Sept. 12, 2012, ownership balances of members are Wilma, 6.18%; plaintiff, 52.91%; Constantine, 37.13%, and Kathryn 3.78%, although defendants say that plaintiff, Constantine and Kathryn each have 30% of company, and Wilma, 10%. Plaintiff seeks declaratory judgment that members’ respective interests are as plaintiff states above; that proposed amendments to the company are not effective or enforceable; and that Kathryn Roumel be expelled from the company, among other relief.
Law firm: Robert A. Angle, Michael E. Lacy and Nicholas R. Klaiber of Troutman Sanders
Filed: 9/28/2012. CL12004239[private]
James Rouse v. Catbridge Machinery LLC
Plaintiff says he was operating a “Slitter” on Oct. 13, 2010, when tape got stuck on the “razor knife assembly.” Plaintiff says he pulled the handle to stop the Slitter and opened the safety door to get the tape unstuck. The mechanisms are designed to shut down when the safety door is opened, plaintiff says, but the knife fired and severed the plaintiff’s left index finger. It was determined the day after the accident, plaintiff says, that the safety door malfunctioned. Plaintiff alleges negligence and breach of duties by defendant, and seeks judgment in principal sum of $60,000.
Law firm: Keith B. Marcus, ParisBlank
Filed: 9/28/2012. CL12004243
Kathy Gentry v. Robins Family Limited Partnership
Plaintiff says that on or about Dec. 15, 2010, she slipped and fell on ice on the sidewalk and/or parking lot at Tuckahoe Shopping Center. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $100,000.
Law firm: Hunt H. Whitehead and Michele L. Chiocca of Whitehead & Chiocca
Filed: 10/1/2012. CL12004254
Alexander Andrewski v. Certified Services Co.; and Selma R. Mann
Plaintiff operated a business in Richmond in the 2900 block of West Clay Street known as All Service Auto Repair, in property owned by defendant Mann. Defendant Certified, a cleaning company, is located at 2916 W. Marshall St., adjacent to plaintiff’s property. During 2012, plaintiff says, defendant Certified began placing barrels containing cleaning products, garbage and other waste against the back door of plaintiff’s shop building. Plaintiff says that because of fire hazard he repeatedly moved the barrels away from his shop, but that defendant Certified continued to place barrels against the property and defendant Mann did nothing to stop it. On Sunday, April 15, 2012, defendant says he noticed smoke toward the rear of the building and contacted the fire department. Plaintiff’s business was a complete loss, and many cars under repair were damaged. Plaintiff also says he lost all equipment and materials. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $1.3 million.
Law firm: Travis R. Williams of Daniels & Morgan
Filed: 10/1/2012. CL12004255
Carter Machinery Group LLC v. Martin Construction Group LLC; “JHM” LLC; and James H. Martin Jr.
Plaintiff seeks to recover debts owed by defendants as the mere continuation of their predecessor company, J.H. Martin & Sons, and also seeks damages resulting from defendants’ alleged conspiracy to injure plaintiff in its business by fraudulently depriving it of any meaningful ability to enforce its credit financing agreement with J.H. Martin & Sons. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $397,680.85.
Law firm: W. Ryan Snow and David C. Hartnett of Crenshaw, Ware & Martin
Filed: 10/1/2012. CL12004259
Xenith Bank v. Third Avenue Properties LLC; Third Avenue Market Inc.; Mohammad Ashraf, individually; and Mohammad Ashraf, as trustee in the liquidation for Third Avenue Properties LLC
Plaintiff says defendant’s loan for the business in Farmville is in default, and seeks judgment in principal sum of not less than $222,119.20, among other relief.
Law firm: E. Duffy Myrtetus and Matthew B. Chmiel of Kaufman & Canoles
Filed: 10/2/2012. CL12004268
Yellowbook Inc. vs. Fencing Unlimited Inc.; and Roberta J. Nelson
Plaintiff says defendant entered into a contract on or about Aug. 6, 2009, to advertise in several Yellow Book Directories. Plaintiff says defendant is indebted to it, and seeks judgment in principal sum of $30,725.91.
Law firm: Stephen A. Angelidis of Steingold & Angelidis
Filed: 10/3/2012. CL12004278
Xenith Bank v. Sandy Bottom Materials Inc.; and Jennifer L. Trump
Plaintiff says defendant is in default on notes and seeks judgment in principal sum of not less than $138,388.21, among other relief, including repossession of collateral.
Law firm: E. Duffy Myretetus & Matthew B. Chmiel of Kaufman & Canoles
Filed: 10/3/2012. CL12004279
Diana Prosyk v. Kroger Limited Partnership I; Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services LLC; The Kroger Co.; and Kroger Group Inc.
Plaintiff says that on Nov. 24, 2010, on property in Salem, that because of negligence she fell and suffered severe injuries. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $750,000.
Law firm: Irving M. Blank of ParisBlank
Filed: 10/4/2012. CL12004285
Dorian Ward v. J.C. Penney Co. Inc.; and Dale Roberts
On or about Dec. 29, 2011, plaintiff says he was shopping with his girlfriend, Eleanor Scharmer, at the store in Regency Square. Scharmer intended to exchange four pairs of pants she had received from her grandmother for Christmas. Through a series of events that included an eventual return of the pants and issuance of a gift card, on which Scharmer purchased some items, they left the store. Plaintiff says they were accosted and detained by defendant Roberts, a security guard, who accused them of stealing items and returning them for credit. Plaintiff says they were interrogated in a small room, with no access to the restroom or refreshments, and that they pleaded with Roberts to review the video footage, and volunteered to have the grandmother fax copies of the receipt for the purchase of the original items, but Roberts refused. After a lengthy period of time, plaintiff says, police were contacted. Plaintiff and Scharmer were issued a summons for petit larceny and instructed to appear in court on Jan. 5, 2012, and the items were taken from them. Upon leaving the store, plaintiff and Scharmer say they tried to find a lawyer, but this was difficult as it was the New Year’s holiday that weekend. Several days later, plaintiff says, Scharmer received a voice message from a J.C. Penney representative apologizing for the mistaken detainment and that said all charges would be dismissed. The representative instructed plaintiff and Scharmer to return to the store to pick up their items and a letter of apology. Plaintiff says they went to court to ensure that their charges would be dismissed, and were informed that defendant Roberts had been fired. Plaintiff says he and Scharmer were made to wait 30 minutes or more at the store for their items and the apology letter. Plaintiff alleges false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligent hiring and negligent training. Plaintiff seeks $500,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages.
Law firm: Tracy Ann Houck and Medford J. Brown IV of Parrish, Houck & Snead
Filed: 10/5/2012. CL12004295
Eleanor Scharmer v. J.C. Penney Co. Inc.; and Dale Roberts
On or about Dec. 29, 2011, plaintiff says she was shopping with her boyfriend, Dorian Ward, at the store in Regency Square. Plaintiff intended to exchange four pairs of pants she had received from her grandmother for Christmas. Through a series of events that included an eventual return of the pants and issuance of a gift card, on which she purchased some items, they left the store. Plaintiff says they were accosted and detained by defendant Roberts, a security guard, who accused them of stealing items and returning them for credit. Plaintiff says they were interrogated in a small room, with no access to the restroom or refreshments, and that they pleaded with Roberts to review the video footage, and volunteered to have her grandmother fax copies of the receipt for the purchase of the original items, but Roberts refused. After a lengthy period of time, plaintiff says, police were contacted. Plaintiff and Ward were issued a summons for petit larceny and instructed to appear in court on Jan. 5, 2012, and the items were taken from them. Upon leaving the store, plaintiff and Ward say they tried to find a lawyer, but this was difficult as it was the New Year’s holiday that weekend. Several days later, plaintiff says, she received a voice message from a J.C. Penney representative apologizing for the mistaken detainment and that said all charges would be dismissed. The representative instructed plaintiff and Ward to return to the store to pick up their items and a letter of apology. Plaintiff says they went to court to ensure that their charges would be dismissed, and were informed that defendant Roberts had been fired. Plaintiff says she and Ward were made to wait 30 minutes or more at the store for their items and the apology letter. Plaintiff alleges false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligent hiring and negligent training. Plaintiff seeks $500,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages.
Law firm: Tracy Ann Houck and Medford J. Brown IV of Parrish, Houck & Snead
Filed: 10/5/2012. CL12004296
Cynthia E. Taylor v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP and John Doe
Plaintiff says the pharmacy in the store at 7901 Brook Road, on or about Nov. 30, 2010, misfilled a prescription for plaintiff for what was supposed to be a refill of Amoxicillin. Plaintiff instead, she says, was given capsules of Neurontin or its chemical equivalent, a powerful medication to which plaintiff had had an adverse reaction in the past. Plaintiff says she took the medication as prescribed and suffered significant injuries, and that she will continue to incur medical expenses. Plaintiff seeks judgment in principal sum of $500,000.
Law firm: Thomas D. Stokes of Brenner, Evans & Millman
Filed: 10/5/2012. CL12004297
Henrico
Monica L. Ball v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., a Japanese corporation
Plaintiff says she was prescribed Dexilant 60 mg to take daily for a period of 30 days in preparation for endoscopy on Sept. 24, 2010, and also stemming from such symptoms as excessive gas, abdominal pain and dysphagia/odynophagia pain which radiated from her stomach through her esophagus. Plaintiff, then age 33, says she ingested the drug daily from Sept. 8, 2010, through Sept. 28, 2010, with the exception of the days she prepared for and underwent a colonoscopy and suffered complication on Sept. 28 and on Sept. 30. On Sept. 28, plaintiff says she went to St. Mary’s Hospital with a fever and other symptoms. On Sept. 30, she was admitted to St. Mary’s with a 104.4-degree fever, rapidly progressing exfoliative lesions over 70 percent of her body, and desquamating throat lesions from her oropharynx to her lips, as well as conjunctival effusion from her eyes. She was later diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and by a physician at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore. Plaintiff says the syndrome and resulting injuries were a proximate cause of plaintiff’s ingestion of defendants’ product Dexilant. Plaintiff says she died three times and was revived, has suffered severe pain and permanent injuries, and continued months of care and treatment at St. Mary’s, Johns Hopkins and other clinics, and will require continuing treatment. Plaintiff says had she known of the risks and dangers associated with the product, she would not have taken it. Plaintiff alleges that defendants have reaped huge profits while concealing from the public knowledge of the potential hazard associated with Dexilant. Plaintiff contends defendants had notice and knowledge prior to the date of the marketing and sale to plaintiff that the product presented a substantial and unreasonable risk of hazard to consumers. Plaintiff alleges failure to warn, defect in design or manufacture, fraud, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, negligence, gross negligence and unjust enrichment, and seeks judgment including punitive damages of $17.5 million.
Law firm: Jerrod M. Smith of Jerrod Myron Smith & Associates
Filed: 10/3/2012. CL12002755
Chesterfield
Creedle, Jones, and Alga PC v. Old River Cabinets Inc.
Plaintiff and defendant agreed on Jan. 15, 2009, that plaintiff would provide accounting services for defendant. Plaintiff alleges breach of contract and says it is owed an amount of not less than $61,936.79, and seeks judgment in that amount.
Law firm: Courtney Moates Paulk and Nathaniel L. Story of Hirschler Fleischer
Filed: 10/4/2012. CL12002992[/private]