[ Login ]   [ Register ]

Victory for Oregon Hill apartments plan

David Larter January 8, 2013 15
The old Victory Rug building.

The old Victory Rug building will become 12 “unusually large apartments.” (Photo by David Larter)

Clarification: In the revised plans for the Victory Rug apartments, the developer will provide eight parking spots, not 15 as originally stated.

A local developer pulled off some last-minute acrobatics and sent his controversial development in Oregon Hill sailing through the planning commission on its way to City Council.

Guy Blundon of CMB Development, who is planning a rehab apartment project in the old Victory Rug building at 407 S. Cherry St., on Monday struck an eleventh-hour deal with the Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association to drop its opposition to the development, allowing Blundon to gain unanimous approval for his project at the city planning commission.

“We finished that deal outside before the meeting,” Blundon said. “We signed the papers just before going in.”

In exchange for having the neighbors back down, Blundon agreed to restrict VCU students from leasing the units, other than “clearly responsible adults” such as military veterans and married couples.

The neighbors had launched vociferous opposition to Blundon’s original plan to build 24 apartments in the 18,500-square-foot building, using an adjoining vacant lot for parking.

After more than a year of wrangling, Blundon reduced the number of units to 12, and he will use part of the vacant lot to build a three-bedroom, single-family home that will screen the parking lot from its frontage on Albemarle Street.

“These are going to be unusually large apartments,” Blundon said at the hearing. “Rents based on price per square foot are going to be significantly lower than in comparable properties.”

Blundon originally estimated the cost of the development to be about $3 million. The final cost, with the reduced number of units and the addition of a 2,000-square-foot house on the vacant lot, isn’t yet clear.

He is financing the project with Xenith Bank.

Blundon told the planning commission he was going to ask between $1,300 and $1,800 per unit for rent.

Todd Woodson, the treasurer of the Oregon Hill neighborhood association, told the commission that the neighbors were still not thrilled about the impact on parking in the neighborhood – Blundon is providing 8 parking spots – but that the developer’s effort to keep students out of the apartments was enough to warrant their support of the final plan.

Several residents did speak out against the project at Monday’s meeting despite the neighborhood association’s official stamp of approval, saying that the language in the agreement didn’t go far enough to exclude all students from living in the apartments.

Residents have maintained that the large number of VCU students living in the Oregon Hill area drag down the neighborhood because they make too much noise.

Amy Howard, a University of Richmond professor and member of the planning commission, questioned the deal to keep VCU students out, asking if it might be discriminatory to exclude students.

Blundon said it was a tricky solution but one he thought would pass legal muster.

“I’ve checked with my lawyer on this one, and it turns out that college students are not a protected class,” he said. “It’s a minefield, but I think it’s doable.”

Blundon said that as long as he was not specifically discriminating against anyone for matters such as race or age, he should be able to stick to the agreed upon restriction.

Blundon and his company CMB Development most recently developed the Link Apartments in Manchester in partnership with Dominion Realty Partners and Grubb Properties. He has also developed senior housing apartments, including the Atlantic at Twin Hickory and the Atlantic at Brook Run.

Print Friendly and PDF

Editor's Picks

15 Comments »

  1. Jay January 8, 2013 at 9:36 am - Reply

    He’d actually probably cause less trouble if he discriminated on age vs status as a college student.

    If I understand the law correcty, age (specifically youth) is not a protected class except against people 40 and older (and I’m not even sure that applies to housing). For instance, he could say no residents under the age of 25 (I think the Prestwould condominium building has a similar statute: the primary resident must be over 25). This is how senior living facilities are permitted.

    I’m betting he agreed to the “no VCU student” agreement knowing that it would be fairly easy to get around. Does it only apply to undergrads? Full-time students? Part-time? What about an executive MBA student? If I lived in that building, how would any of the neighbors know if I were a young professional vs a student (other than the fact that I leave every morning and arrive home around 5:30pm)?

    That being said, I’m glad to see this property getting redeveloped, whether with 12 large luxury apartments or 24 smaller apartments. It’d be nice to see some type of retail on the ground floor.

  2. MikeinVA January 8, 2013 at 11:21 am - Reply

    He is prob safe on Fair Housing issues for Age and Matriculation (students). And sounds like Oregon Hill residents just learned how to address their concerns in the future. A future without newly-educated people wanting to live in Oregon Hill.

  3. Tardus January 8, 2013 at 12:36 pm - Reply

    Actually the developer is only providing 8 off-street parking spaces.

  4. Stuart Squier January 8, 2013 at 1:14 pm - Reply

    Housing discrimination and mandatory car driving, OH is turning into a model Henricofield cul de sac.

  5. Christina January 8, 2013 at 2:48 pm - Reply

    At least Henricofield cul de sacs don’t have people throwing beer bottles in their front yards and they have a place to park their cars.

    I’ve lived in the neighborhood for 6 years and the level of neighborhood respect of owner’s vs. renters has a large gap.

    The compromise of 12 apartments is a much better outcome than what was originally proposed. I just feel that people who read this article and don’t live in the area should know that where the residents’ concerns lie is the parking and the increase in graffiti, littering, and destruction of personal property that I have personally seen increase since more student renters have moved into homes that used to be occupied by owners.

  6. Jason January 8, 2013 at 9:11 pm - Reply

    There is also a substantial number of renters and VCU students in the Fan, Carver, and Jackson Ward, so I am not so sure the logic holds up for sagging down the neighborhood.

    Perhaps what’s actually holding down the neighborhood are slumlords? inept property owners? too much resistance to development few are willing to make new investments?

  7. Stuart Squier January 8, 2013 at 10:17 pm - Reply

    Ditto what Jason said. The neighborhoods he mentioned also have permitted resident street parking which OH has refused for years, thus causing the very shortage of “free” parking they complain about today.

  8. Vivian Becnel January 8, 2013 at 11:25 pm - Reply

    How’s the atmosphere of the neighborhood in this places? Is this a safe street?

  9. Scott January 9, 2013 at 12:32 am - Reply

    As a resident, I would like to confirm Christina’s comments.

    And by the way, I hear the same complaints from residents in the Fan, Carver, and Jackson Ward. There’s a reason there is now a City noise ordinance and a Fan party patrol, and that reason is too many students who either don’t know how to live in an urban neighborhood or don’t care to learn. VCU has done some good things for Richmond, but it’s community relations suck despite its nonstop p.r. campaigns.

    I think its pretty telling that even though an agreement was reached there are still haters and commenters from VCU who continue to try to paint Oregon Hill as ‘unreasonable’ for defending itself. These people have no honor.

    This article should have included some of the basic street problems that this SUP ignores:

    Section 114-1050 of the city code that says “the city council … may authorize the issuance of special use permits … whenever council finds that the proposed use will not: …2) Tend to create congestion in the streets roads, alleys, and other public ways and places in the area involved 3). Create hazards from fire …”

    The street is so narrow that it will cause congestion and may prohibit fire truck access that would create a hazard from fire. Hollywood Cemetery buses also park on the block.

    The city staff incorrectly cited the Riverfront District zoning regulations to support using some on-street parking to satisfy the off-street parking requirements. (This is a mis-application of the zoning code, since Oregon Hill is not in the Riverfront District.) — but even if we were in the Riverfront District, only two on-street parking spaces would be applied to his project. (The frontage of the building is only 45′ wide and the Riverfront District would allow two spaces fronting the building, but the staff applied three spaces.)

    I could go on about the development itself, but rather than put the developer down at this point, I will just say that I will live with the agreement as negotiated in good faith by my neighborhood association. The 12 units with 21 bedrooms is definitely better than the 18 units with 26 bedrooms that would have gotten approved if Marty Jewell was re-elected. The agreement not to rent to undergraduates will be hard to enforce, but better than no agreement at all.

    Between this Victory Rug renovation, Parson’s Row, the Overlook condos, and other smaller projects, Oregon Hill has a remarkable record of tolerance, marked by a willingness to negotiate- when it is done fairly for proper neighborhood development.

  10. Morgan January 9, 2013 at 9:31 am - Reply

    Thank you Jason and Stuart… pretty soon no one is going to take Oregon Hill’s complaints seriously–in some instances, that’s already happening. I wonder if the neighbors have actually introduced themselves to the students and made an effort to formulate a relationship?

  11. Jesse January 9, 2013 at 9:32 am - Reply

    The fact that being married or a veteran automatically classifies you as a responsible adult is amusing to me.

  12. Christina January 10, 2013 at 2:31 pm - Reply

    Jesse i wouldn’t consider being on my death bed or married “responsible” either. I think owning a home and caring what happens around me, makes me responsible. I’m in my 20’s and care a great deal about what happens in Oregon Hill.

    I can say yes i have intorduced myself to the neighbors. I can name every single person who lives 3-4 four houses to the left and right of me. I walk my dog as do others and we greet each other when we do. We look out for each other when we see things that shouldn’t be happening, We sweep leaves, and shovel snow together on my block. When it is Halloween and Christmas we all speak to each other and help put up our decorations. So to respond to Morgan, yes i know as many neighbors as i think you can.

    As for the parking Stuart, I personally would not like to see parking passes. did you know that the Fan has more parking passes than there are actual spaces on the street. What good would 150 parking passes do if we only have room for 100 cars to park?

    Its upsetting that people are becoming offended by this “no student” request but it’s helpful for us in the long run. We can’t control who the home owners decided to rent to, and students are a viable tennent for them since we are so close to campus; however, i am pleased we were able to put a restriction on the apartments that will be put into the old Victory rug place, and i’m sure the developers will have no problem filling them. I

  13. jd January 10, 2013 at 2:55 pm - Reply

    Could a parent of a student sign a lease making the lease is between the landlord and non-student?

  14. Stuart January 10, 2013 at 3:56 pm - Reply

    I don’t know the answer Cristina, but what good has no parking restriction done for the neighborhood? If it was an effective policy we wouldn’t have to listen to the constant griping about VCU students taking all the neighborhood parking.

    To the point about parked cars impeding traffic on Cherry Street, the city should prohibit parking there since the ROW is so narrow. That’s a separate issue from the occupancy of the adjacent buildings.

    The character of OH has certainly changed in the last couple decades, and not just in the number of students. In the 90’s the neighborhood had more violent ways of keeping outsider behavior in check which usually involved mob assault. But all that changed in the 2000’s as more upwardly mobile people bought into the neighborhood and now we see the outcome of that gentrification- students do not fit into the upper middle class aspirations of the new OH bourgeois owner class.

  15. Joe January 11, 2013 at 8:36 am - Reply

    I live in the neighborhood and the Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association does not speak for me. Im embarassed by this. I moved here for differsity and open minded people. Look what I am getting. Why does someone move to Oregon Hill if they dont like VCU? Theres plenty of room in the suburbs for close minded people. Please move.

Leave A Response »

Please use your real, full name (first and last) and a valid email address to foster a more civil discussion. Comments without first and last name may not be approved.


We encourage active participation in our online community, but we reserve the right to remove any off topic or inappropriate comments.