200 more apartments coming to Shockoe Bottom

January 7, 2010 by Al Harris · 10 Comments 

More apartments are coming to Shockoe Bottom.

George Emerson of the Emerson Companies said his firm is breaking ground this week on a 204-unit complex at 18th and Broad streets to be called the Cedar Broad Apartments.

Emerson said the project had been in the planning and financing stages for about three years, but his development company just closed on the property about two weeks ago. The company purchased the 2.1-acre site from BAT Properties for $3.2 million. The total budget, including acquisition, is about $19 million, he said. Read more




Shockoe businesses sue city for $31 million

August 28, 2009 by Al Harris · 9 Comments 

gastonlawsuit1Time has not healed all wounds.

Within weeks of the five-year anniversary of a flood that ruined dozens of businesses in Shockoe Bottom, several businesses filed a lawsuit against the City of Richmond.

Those proprietors and property owners aren’t blaming Mother Nature for the havoc caused on that rainy August day in 2004, but rather the city for failing to maintain and inspect flood control systems in the Bottom. Read more




Monday Q&A: Frustration floods Shockoe

June 29, 2009 by Aaron Kremer · 2 Comments 

renderingbaseballbottomSometimes good things don’t come to those who wait. Shockoe Bottom merchants are frustrated that Richmond will not be getting a baseball stadium and more than $300 million in development to potentially help rocket the area into a thriving hub of commerce. That’s because the master developer, Highwoods Properties, has withdrawn its plan. The news release did not make clear exactly why, but several merchants have said it is likely because Highwoods did not get the necessary level of interest from city administrators.

The master plan included condos, retail and a ballpark that would be home to a locally owned AA team. Detractors had said that the city might have ended up paying back the bonds if the stadium and team didn’t thrive as the developers expected and that the project was not worth that risk.

David Napier, president of the Shockoe Bottom Neighborhood Association and owner of the Old City Bar, said that even though all the businesses in the area didn’t necessarily agree on the value of baseball, they all got behind the development to fix the biggest impediment to finally making the district thrive: the risk of flooding.

RBS talked with Napier over the weekend about how the news hit local merchants and why the area can’t seem to catch a break.

Below is an edited transcript.

Richmond BizSense:
When did you hear the deal was off?

David Napier: The day it was called off. The developers of ballpark sent the news release to me as president of the neighborhood association. That was two hours before it was on TV.

RBS: Was there any warning that the deal was falling apart?

DN: We knew that the deal wasn’t getting done quickly because the city had to evaluate the direction it was going to take. Obviously, the developer was not getting what it needed. I think our print media did the residents of Richmond a disservice. I feel like print media got caught up in baseball, which was less than 10 percent of this deal, a creative way to fix the flood plain and open up the Boulevard.

Frankly, I’m not a passionate baseball person. I’m a passionate economic development person. This is a historic lost opportunity.

RBS: Why has that part of town been so slow to grow?

DN: Until the city spends many millions to do what the baseball park was going to do with flood plain issues, what you see is what you get. The city has about maxed out on what it can do on its own, until they use city tax dollars or tax incremental financing on other projects. That’s one reason Henrico eats our lunch. And there’s nothing wrong with that – it’s an economic opportunity for Henrico. The city needs to realize that a city that does not invest in itself slowly dies.

RBS: Do you think Highwoods pulling out will hit the local businesses hard, perhaps psychologically?

DN: Zuupa is now leaving the Bottom to go to Rocketts Landing. So we just lost another restaurant. I wouldn’t be surprised if things get worse down here before they get better.

RBS: Do you think the mayor moved too slowly?

DN: He has a lot on his plate, and he has to trust advisers. I think he could have gotten better advice. It’s time now for bold leadership from the mayor. He can’t look back. He has got to think about what can we do.

RBS: You expressed some frustration at the media coverage, and we’ve heard that from other local business people.

DN: When your paper and your weeklies have a position that affects their objective reporting, all citizens as well as mayor get only one side of what’s going on.

RBS: Was that a failure to win the PR battle? Isn’t that a part of any plan, just like hiring engineers or lawyers?

DN: You can talk to newspapers and try to explain your side of story. But if they choose not to print it, there’s nothing you can do. I’m not a PR person. I felt obligated to get the facts.

RBS: Merchants in Shockoe Bottom have complained for years that the gunfire at night scares off consumers. Is there a reason the local police can’t get that under control? I know you have proposed a nightclub permit to help vet club owners.

DN: I’ve been informed that it’s a race issue and that the city will not implement a regulation to help the situation. That the clubs are being “targeted” because they cater to a black clientele. But remember, these clubs are in clear violation of ABC laws and causing problems.

And keep in mind – I love nightclubs. It’s an integrated neighborhood down here. And there are some thriving clubs that cater to black crowds and only a couple bad ones. It’s also not a Shockoe problem. It’s a behavior problem.

RBS: Lots of cities are known for thriving nightlife districts. Why can’t it seem to stick there?

DN: There are a few bad players taking advantage of ABC laws, who don’t care about taking care of the neighborhood. We’ve got to get them to change what they do or change where they do it.

RBS: Moving back to the ballpark, how did the news hit you?

DN: It was very frustrating. I was pretty disappointed. I may have gone to a few games, but the ballpark wasn’t even on top of my radar screen. It was cleaning up this neighborhood. The empty buildings suddenly would have become more attractive. We would have seen an immediate change with excitement.

Sooner or later, we have to take a bold step. Anything is better. I’m at the point where I’d take a Target or a Wal-Mart.

That would be not my first choice, but anything is better than what we’ve got. We’re going downhill. We just lost a great restaurant. I haven’t talked to Zuppa, but I feel sure that if a ballpark were coming, they would not have given up that location.

Aaron Kremer is the BizSense editor. Please send news tips to Editor@richmondbizsense.com.




Asking for change in response to panhandling

May 12, 2009 by Al Harris · 2 Comments 

panhandlerThey wait with pleading eyes at busy intersections and highway off-ramps.

They hold tattered signs that read: “Homeless please give spare change” or “Every little bit helps.”

As the economy continues to drag, panhandlers are an increasingly common sight along roadways and shopping districts around Richmond. Local businesses, in particular retailers, say panhandlers scare off customers, even if there is no threat to safety. And a growing homeless population can also be a blemish for economic developers trying to show off the region. Read more




Op/Ed The road ahead for Shockoe Bottom

April 17, 2009 by David Napier · 1 Comment 

shedShockoe Bottom has come a long way since the devastating aftermath of Tropical Depression Gaston in 2004. Crime is at all time lows. We have many new restaurants that complement the traditional charm of the neighborhood, and we remain the fastest growing census tract in the city. Read more